Beyond the signature: Ethereum’s next safety question
New research asks whether a transaction should have to prove it delivered the outcome its signer intended.
Saved on this device. No account required.
Nothing saved yet. Use the + on any article. Explore explainers →
New research asks whether a transaction should have to prove it delivered the outcome its signer intended.
zkAPI separates metered API payments from the billing identity behind individual requests.
Bitcoin Core 29.4’s release notes describe a fix for excessive chainstate disk activity.
Why a payment can create an output for the recipient and another for the sender.
Key management and transaction validation are separate responsibilities.
The label on a website is not a description of everything a contract can do.
A network’s low fee is only one part of its operating model.
An address may represent data, an executable program or a token holding—not a person.
Reconciliation is part of a payment product, not an optional afterthought.
Why applications need explicit freshness and failure handling for chain data.
Why the headline value in a pool can conceal where trading depth actually sits.
An accurate observation can become unsuitable when conditions move.
One balance can depend on more than one protocol staying functional.
A chart compresses trades; it does not explain every reason behind them.
Different venues, timestamps and methodologies can create different snapshots.
How to read release events without assuming every unlocked token will be sold.
The score is only meaningful when the evaluation conditions are clear.
Integrity, provenance and factual truth are three separate checks.
A service-wide indicator and your own request history describe different things.
Inside the receipt-verification project and the separate role of its PVTY token.